All over the world air jordan 2011,As Chandra Levy's mother and father and hundreds of other mourners ready for a memorial service today in her hometown of Modesta, Calif. investigators confirmed that the 24-year-old had been murdered. But Washington medical examiner Dr. Jonathan Arden said it was still unclear how Levy had been killed. Whilst the determination that her death was homicide opens the door for a full-scale investigation, forensic specialists face a tough challenge in obtaining towards the bottom of her death. NEWSWEEK's Jennifer Barrett spoke about the process with Dr. Henry Lee, a forensic scientist who continues to be involved in high-profile investigations, which includes the O.J. Simpson, Vincent Foster and Martha Moxley cases.NEWSWEEK: The Washington health-related examiner says he has insufficient proof to arrive at a conclusion as to a particular injury that brought on Levy's death. Did his findings surprise you?Dr. Henry Lee: No, it was no surprise. That's a predictable outcome with the trigger of death because the body had decomposed. Unless you found a fractured skull or an apparent sign of injury, you cannot come up having a conclusion concerning the trigger with the death.Then how can one conclude that Levy was murdered?As for the manner with the death, they are able to base that on other info apart from an autopsy. You can look at her hospital record, her well being condition, the location with the body and other elements, and also you can derive a most likely manner of death. There are five outcomes: homicide, suicide, accidental death, natural cause and undetermined trigger. More than likely, he utilized a process of elimination. It did not seem to be an accidental death. She was not hit by a car or by lightening. And she didn't leave a suicide note and there was no sign of a tendency to commit suicide. She was in great well being situation so it's unlikely that she died of organic causes--a heart attack or other health complications. So, it was most likely a homicide.Could not you rule out some causes--that she was shot or stabbed, for example? Wouldn't which have been evident by marks on her skeleton?Due to the nature with the bones, you cannot rule out any of these causes of death. With out [body] tissue, you cannot rule them out. You need to do a more comprehensive forensic investigation. The physique itself did not yield sufficient clues.I know you did not participate in the investigation itself. But, generally, what would be the first questions you inquire when a body is found? What are the first actions?The very first and most significant factor is to identify the physique. Who's the victim? You use DNA dental records, facial recognition. Chandra Levy's stays were identified [through dental records]. Then you try and determine the manner and trigger of death. If you can't establish trigger but you can establish the manner, then the homicide investigation can be opened. Then you inquire who committed the crime? You appear at the physical proof in the crime scene, look over witness statements, and look at other info you can gather.How big a function do you think the discovery of her remains will play in the general investigation?Essentially, the medical examiner said the info was not there to find the cause of death, so you truly do not have much to go additional. Of course, the forensic examination of the clothing and shoes as well as other associated objects at the scene becomes very important.What happens now? Are you able to stroll us through the next steps of the investigation?Ordinarily, what we'd do is reinterview everyone after which interview anyone who is usually jogging via that component of the park [where Levy's stays had been found]. There will nonetheless be a much more comprehensive examination of her physique stays and the clothing and belongings found nearby. The other factor would be to re-examine the crime scene and to go through the bushes and area nearby.What will they be searching for?People always ask me what I'm searching for. I say, When I find it, I will let you know. But, for example, you can locate a bullet casing or sift via and find cigarette butts--anything can be pertinent. Until you find it although, it's very difficult to know what you are looking for.It will be difficult with this particular scene. With outside crime scenes along with a decomposed physique, with those type of instances, you need somebody with a large amount of experience and it will be a great deal of tedious function. Having a fresh physique, everyone can inform how the person was killed. Within this situation, having a skeleton, the crime scene becomes so essential.The very first factor you determine is whether it is a main scene or secondary scene. Was she killed there or was the physique moved there? Within the O.J. Simpson situation, it was a primary scene. The 2nd thing is whether or not it's an energetic or perhaps a passive scene. An active scene involves a struggle or fighting. In a passive scene, the victim may have recognized the attacker. If it's somebody she understands then there is no fighting. With Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, they fought back. There were numerous stab wounds, which suggests an energetic scene. Inside a passive scene, a victim could be sitting in a chair and killed from a single bullet to the head, whilst nothing else is disturbed at the scene. Then investigators need to look at whether or not it was a planned or a spur-of-the-moment murder. A crime scene is a dynamic location. You will find a lot of things to look at to be able to attain an intelligent conclusion.Over a year has passed because Levy disappeared. How much evidence are you able to discover in the crime scene following so many months?I wasn't in the scene so it is difficult to know. But within the Vincent Foster case, we went towards the scene a year and a half later on and we discovered a lot evidence. We had been in a position to conclude it was constant with suicide. So long as no one destroyed the scene, they might find some proof. But if the scene was not secured well, then it may happen to be dug via or excavated. It'll be challenging.Police stated they discovered Levy's University of Southern California sweatshirt, a sports activities bra and tennis footwear, along with a pair of knotted leggings at the scene. Just how much are you able to learn from the clothes? You have said that trace evidence from clothing--like hairs and fibers and DNA--can be utilized to hyperlink someone towards the death of the person.I don't know the condition with the clothing. But frequently, after a year, the condition is still pretty great. First, they are able to look for biological stains: blood, saliva or semen stains can be discovered following that long. But a great deal depends upon the condition of the clothes. They are able to also appear for hairs and fibers that belong to her. In one situation, we found canine hairs that linked a homicide to a suspect following 18 months. You need to appear at what you have. The knotted legging could indicate foul play. You would wish to get a knot expert to appear at whether it was a left-handed or right-handed person and make other interpretations.Out of your experience, how much more can we expect to discover about her death?I'm certain they will look at everything in detail over the following few weeks. After the lab report is released, we'll know a lot more.Cool of dazzle jordan shoes for cheap.