Looking for a long time to find out air jordan 2,The Heated Debate Over Stem-Cell ResearchReaders staked out clear and passionate positions on embryonic-stem-cell study, the topic of our Oct. 25 cover story. Some voiced deep concern about its use as a political issue. 1 stated, As it stands now, the science of stem cells remains a crass pawn to politics and towards the raw political ambitions of the couple of. Pointing to techniques that are ethically troubling to numerous, an additional suggested that instead of emotionally casting a presidential vote in an try to 'do something,' more direct action can take the type of pledges in honor or in memory of loved ones to health-related research foundations. This encourages activism and providing, not government lobbying. But for this father of a young girl with juvenile diabetes, there really is no contest: Voting for your candidate who supports government funding will be the simplest thing I will ever do to help my kid, regardless of what my ideology or political leanings.The Cellular DivideThank you for the thoughtful article on stem-cell study (Stem Cell Division, Oct. 25). I do not understand how people who're Okay with in vitro fertilization methods can oppose stem-cell study unless of course they merely do not understand the science behind it. Each procedures tamper with embryos or attempt to play God, if you will; why is 1 acceptable while the other is seen like a threat to existence? How is it that discarding leftover embryos--throwing them within the trash, practically a every day occurrence within this country--is observed as much less of a travesty than using them to try to save people's lives? How can it be acceptable to manipulate embryos to make more people (particularly when there are a lot of residing kids in desperate need of houses), but unacceptable to manipulate them to conserve individuals residing with terrible illnesses? I find this viewpoint hypocritical and self-righteous, and I find it incomprehensible that people would accept an outlook that, in essence, says it is Okay to play God to make much more babies, but not to save them from suffering and disease as soon as they are right here.Amber GudikunstWest Chester, Pa.On Oct. 3 my husband died of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a illness for which there isn't any known cause and no remedy. We knew when he was diagnosed 2-1/2 years ago that it was a death sentence. Nonetheless, he continued to advocate for ALS and stem-cell research. Your post says that Laura Bush says it is unfair to give households false hope, however the fact is, stem-cell study presents some hope. Not for those currently ill, but the hope that nobody else may have to suffer in the long term. My husband lived bravely with ALS and died bravely; assisting raise cash for ALS and stem-cell study gave him a sense of objective and hope. A teacher, his hope for future generations was part of his whole existence.Joyce Hlava OgdenCupertino, Calif.Four many years ago, I lost my father to the living hell that is Parkinson's illness. Inch by inch my intelligent, talented, fun-loving father, an artist, slipped away to this dreadful illness. In the first posts I ever saw around the subject, the promise of stem-cell study has fascinated me. Those of us who have traveled this road know only too nicely that stem-cell research doesn't provide a remedy right around the corner, as the Initial Lady stated. But we also know that we won't discover where this study will take us unless we attempt. Limiting the lines of stem cells only impedes progress. For those who would bring God into the discussion, I was taught that all things in this world come from God. I think that would include stem cells and the understanding acquired from study to date. Who are we to query His strategy?Barbara AllamianWood Dale, Ill.Scientifically, there isn't any hard line to draw exactly where the life of a human individual begins. We only understand that when sperm cell and egg fuse, the resulting cell bears the genetic and biochemical potential to turn out to be a new human person. Everything else is viewpoint, not science. Only God knows at what stage the existence of a human person truly begins. Who are we to play God and misuse these cells? Science that ignores ethics is bad science, regardless of what progress it makes. Plenty of scientists agree on this with respect to cloning of human beings. In my own view as a biochemist, it also applies to therapeutic embryonic-stem-cell research.Albrecht MoritzSalem, Mass.Wow! Your cover says it all, doesn't it? Out of all of the news from Hollywood of stars' marrying and divorcing--and remarrying and residing with boyfriends and girlfriends young sufficient to become their children--comes 1 stunning, haunting photograph of Dana and Christopher Reeve to show us what real adore is all about. Thank you.Dan CoylePhiladelphia, Pa.Let there be no doubt about it: with or without the funding from the U.S. government, stem-cell research will go on because it is as well exciting to be ignored from the scientific neighborhood at big. Cutting off funding towards the National Institutes of Well being wouldn't stop China, India, Japan and European nations from creating technology. It is not challenging to picture that one day we will wind up purchasing the results of this technology from them. I can imagine calls for congressional hearings and finger-pointing by those who will not hear of it now. I challenge religious and political leaders to proclaim that they'll deny themselves any benefit in the remedy resulting from the stem-cell technologies. Let us see how sincere they're.Nrapendra NathSilver Spring, Md.The promise of embryonic-stem-cell research occurs precisely since the embryo destroyed within the process was once both alive and human. As this kind of, the harvesting of embryonic stem cells represents a type of medical cannibalism. If we cannot safeguard human existence at its most vulnerable stages, basic constitutional protections will wither away and die, along with the human embryos willingly and wrongfully destroyed for spare physique components. To his excellent credit, President George W. Bush has acknowledged that this kind of stem-cell research poses very severe ethical issues. Blind to such ethical problems, John Kerry advocates rather a crass utilitarianism. For Kerry, the finish really does justify the indicates.Richard H. Escobales Jr.Buffalo, N.Y.As an Evangelical Christian with conservative beliefs, I'd nonetheless opt for complete and full study of stem cells. There appears to become numerous varying expert opinions on embryonic versus adult stem cells, and the efficacy of 1 over the other. We will by no means have the answers without research. Then, it might eventually come down to a individual choice of therapy, like birth manage is today: there are some choices that blatantly discard a fertilized egg every month, and some that do not. Each person makes their very own option depending on their values. But we cannot make judgments with out complete information concerning the options accessible.Paul LykeSpring Hill, Tenn.This previous summer my husband, Paul Maibaum, had the fantastic privilege of operating because the director of photography on Christopher Reeve's final directorial work, the Television movie The Brooke Ellison Story. Paul returned from that expertise a changed man. For 7 weeks they worked together 10 hours a day, frequently six days a week. Chris arrived each day energized with focus, commitment and excellent humor, inspiring everyone to rise towards the top of their profession. He did so with out complaining or bemoaning his physical state, just with passion and dedication. Chris's capability to touch an individual in a deeply profound way is certainly an excellent gift that he will lengthy be remembered and honored for.Julie Dresner MaibaumPacific Palisades, Calif.A Bush-Kerry AssessmentJonathan Alter's evaluation of president Bush's performance in office and Richard Wolffe's of Sen. John Kerry's 20-year record within the Senate clarify what was missing in the debates: a no-spin assessment with the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate (Where the Buck Stops and Kerry from the Book, Oct. 25). Alter exhibits Bush as a largely efficient antiterrorist leader who nonetheless has neglected, dismissed, obscured or been recalcitrant in dealing with many of the problems that beset our nation. Wolffe exhibits Kerry because the junior senator overshadowed by Ted Kennedy, but working insistently and effectively in the background for peaceful resolutions to a few of the troubled spots of the world. Moreover, Wolffe lifts the obfuscating rhetorical veil thrown over Kerry's voting record, particularly on tax legislation. On the other hand, Bush's refusal to listen towards the military's guidance about Afghanistan plus his failure to veto a single investing bill, as shown in Alter's post, give lie to his claims of being a compassionate conservative. What we and the world desperately need is really a leader with a comprehensive vision, 1 who listens and consults, even with his critics; a global uniter, and not a continental divider.Gordon V. BoudreauNorth Syracuse, N.Y.Having read your story on John Kerry, I am much more confident about voting for President Bush. Kerry is listening to overpaid consultants whose extremely purpose within the campaign seems to become to inform the candidate to talk down towards the voter simply because, for example, voters aren't intelligent sufficient to know the distinction between the Financial institution of Credit and Commerce International and the British Broadcasting Company. We're a lot smarter than the consultants, and Kerry ought to inquire for his cash back if he loses on Nov. 2. Kerry is a vibrant man who was elected and re-elected by the voters in Massachusetts who would, no doubt, be offended by this condescending attitude.James B. SheaHazlet, N.J.A Mother's Pressing ConcernsI couldn't agree much more with Robyn Rabbeth Leach (If You want Our Vote, Look Past the Label, My Turn, Oct. 25). I, too, am a mother and have three young children. We never watch the news with our kids in the room due to the graphic pictures and the content material reported. We're so tired of the Chicken Little mentality that tells us we should all be fearful. I am an elementary college teacher, and although my school is lucky not to have the severity of problems that Leach's son's does, the money is becoming cut and, one by one, applications are being restricted. These are the realities of our daily lives. As well poor they're not acknowledged by the people we entrust to make decisions for us. I'm not a soccer mom or perhaps a safety mom. I am a mother who desires my kids to think their country's leaders actually function for them. I want my kids to have a child's life--to play in the leaves, to visit school wanting to discover, to just take the time for you to imagine and be creative. Most significant, I want my kids to think they've the opportunity to be anybody and do something they want in existence.Linda WaltherCedar Falls, IowaRobyn Rabbeth Leach wants a lot from our government. Where within the Constitution does it say the federal government shall spend for her children's school loans, grant her good well being care, feed them totally free lunch and supplement the salaries of their college staff? As a high-school teacher for 30 many years, I'm tired of seeing students wearing $100 footwear, carrying the most expensive cell phones, receiving free lunch. I've worked hard since I was 14 and I don't expect to depend around the government to look after me in my old age (which seems closer from the day). Whatever happened to John F. Kennedy's Ask not what your country can do for you personally...? Leach requirements to function difficult, conserve a bunch, spend less and take care of her own family.Ed StevensAustin, TexasRobyn Rabbeth Leach will be the perfect instance of the American voter who pays more focus to media hype than the real issues within the upcoming presidential election. All of the issues Leach expresses come from the hype produced mainly, but not exclusively, by the Bush campaign--the worry element. If Leach paid even a minuscule quantity of focus by studying a newspaper or perhaps a magazine like NEWSWEEK, and consulting on-line sources, she would discover that all her issues have been addressed by each candidates: school tuition, well being care, Social Safety, funding of training, child care, etc. Mother and father can set a great example for their kids by educating themselves concerning the issues and exactly where every candidate stands. Within this day and age, it is very easy to complete. Then they are able to sit back and stop worrying about the hype.Lora MeisnerRockville, Md.When Soldiers Refuse OrdersA soldier might refuse to obey an order, but only if the order is illegal ( 'I Mean, Raise Pure Hell', Oct. 25). The order may be dangerous unto death, but when it is not illegal, the soldier had better be prepared to take around the assignment. Amber Hill's call to her mother and her plea that they are holding us against our will makes me wonder if a few of our soldiers think they're operating for your local Mini-Mart. Amber, refuse a direct order in fight and you can anticipate to be held against your will. Welcome to the United states Army. However, exactly where in the post is mention with the officer who ordered soldiers to drive a 220-mile exposed run to provide contaminated fuel? Which captain or major believed so little of his troops that perhaps he, too, should be held against his will? Officers get paid the large bucks to achieve the mission with minimum harm to the troops. Even as a 2nd lieutenant, I'd have had enough sense to query a mission to deliver contaminated fuel.Col. James E. Longhofer, U.S. Army (Ret.)Placerville, Calif.A soldier has the right and also the obligation to refuse a command from a superior officer or enlisted person in the event the order is unlawful. While the situation with the contaminated fuel isn't an unlawful order, someone up the chain of command clearly issued orders in a criminally negligent fashion. Hopefully these soldiers will not be punished. What does this incident say about troop morale in Iraq? Does it sound like they're prepared to come home?Miles RothFt. Collins, Colo.I am a little confused. Employees Sgt. Ivan Frederick gets eight years for following orders in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. Simultaneously, the Army considers it inappropriate for a group of soldiers to refuse an order they believed was a suicide mission. That is it? Do we want our soldiers to adhere to orders with out query or not?Jeff MillerNorth Woodmere, N.Y.CorrectionsIn Calling the Shots (Tip Sheet, Oct. 25) we misstated the web deal with of a baseball weblog. It is all-baseball.com, not allbaseball.com.In The New New England (Periscope, Oct. 25) we misspelled the name of a home-design business. The correct title is Deck House, LLC, not Deack House. NEWSWEEK regrets the mistakes.Cool of dazzle jordan shoes for cheap.