<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/streamburner/streamburner.xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
      xml:lang="en"
      xml:base="https://www.justjournal.com">
	<id>urn:jj:justjournal.com:atom1:annniple</id>
		<title></title>
	<author>
		<name>Ann</name>
	</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.justjournal.com/users/annniple"/>
<link rel="self" href="/users/annniple/atom"/>
<generator uri="https://github.com/laffer1/justjournal" version="3.1.10">JustJournal</generator>
<updated>2026-05-07T12:17:21.597Z</updated>
		<entry>
			<id>urn:jj:justjournal.com:atom1:annniple:20860</id>
			<title>USA online casinos</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.justjournal.com/users/annniple/entry/20860"/>
			<published>2010-11-09T01:42:00.000Z</published>
			<updated>2010-11-09T01:42:00.000Z</updated>
			<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;When American government passed the UIGEA in 2006, opinions of
people split up. The same situation was with the states. As a
matter of fact, Kentucky was the first state started acting against
online casinos.In 2008 Kentucky Governor seized 141 domain names.
Until now there are no decisions made on domain names seizure suit.
It seems that everything goes back to its starting point. New suit
concerns payments, and it is said that those online casinos who
were working illegally at Kentucky state , have to pay revenues.
Now the suit is passed to the court and trial begins. Situation
arose according to statute of the state which had never been used
before. We have tried to throw light upon the situation specially 
&lt;a
 href=&quot;http://casinokeeper.net/kentucky-sues-microgaming-software/&quot;&gt;for
you&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</content>
		</entry>
	</feed>
